New Stanford research on speed dating examines what makes couples 'click' in four minutes
In one event, there was hardly any space between daating tables. I could hear every awkward conversation, and not just my own. I did have some nice chats, but I had to wonder: There's some new research on speed dating, coming from researchers in Germany Asendorpf, Penke, and Back, in press. They set up a speed-dating event and invited a total of people men and women who were aged to participate.
All of their participants were real singles whose sole motivation for participation in the study was to find a real-life romantic or sexual mate. Participants went on a series of 3-minute dates and indicated whom they would like to see again. They were followed-up by the researchers six weeks and 12 months after the speed-dating session.
Consistent with parental investment theory, women, on average, tended to state an interest in long-term mating more so than men speed dating success rates. This was only relative though: This suggests that a speed-dating context is one that generally attracts people pursuing long-term mating tactics or at least report that they do! Who were the popular ones?
Popularity was heavily influenced by easily perceivable physical attributes such as facial and vocal attractiveness, height, and weight. Sex differences were also evident, with men mainly basing their decisions on facial attractiveness and women using more speed dating success rates, including high levels of sociosexuality willingness and desire to engage in short-term sexual marriage match making compatibilitylow levels of shynessand cues of current or speed dating success rates resource providing potential such as height, educationincome, and openness to experience but not indicators of steady resource striving such as conscientiousness.
These popularity effects were not significantly influenced by age. Sociosexuality and shyness did a better job predicting popularity in this speed dating context than the personality traits extraversion and neuroticismwhich are correlated with sociosexuality and shyness, respectively sociosexuality with extraversion, shyness with neuroticism. The researchers relate this finding to the bandwidth-fidelity trade-off found in personality research, in datingg.
In fact, sociosexuality was the most important predictor of popularity once physical attributes were already taken into account, and also provided additional prediction of popularity above and beyond physical attractiveness. Since most women expressed an interest in long-term mating, speed dating success rates is surprising that they would be attracted to a man who came across as preferring a short-term mating orientation.
The researchers raise the possibility syccess a male's sociosexuality may indicate his history sccess successful succesz experiences or mating skills i. Another reason may be that those with a short-term mating orientation may have been more extravertedand their extraverted behaviors speed dating success rates noticed and remembered more.
It should also be noted that the relationship between shyness and popularity was negative: The researchers suggest that this may be due to traditional male sex roles, which require dsm dating site to be assertive and proactive in the mating domain, skills that may not come as easily to shy guys. Also, since shyness is correlated with neuroticism, shy individuals may have come across as socially speed dating success rates, which may have made their dating partner feel uncomfortable.
The popularity of the speed-dater was also positively related to the choosiness of that speed-dater, although the correlation was only significant among scucess perhaps due to the fact that women on average were than men. As the researchers note, this finding is consistent with the idea succezs highly popular people are thought to be more careful in their choices while unpopular people are thought to be more indiscriminative see Penke et al.
They also found an age effect: This is consistent with age-related context-dependent mating strategies. The researchers also found rather weak effects of similarity, a finding probably due to the brief interactions these individuals engaged in. Most certainly, it takes more time than 3-minutes to form a deep connection. What about the follow-up? They found that the chances of mating i. These numbers were influenced by the mating orientation speed the other sex, however.
The chances of a women mating increased if their partner speed dating success rates a short-term mating orientation, and the chances of a man mating increased if their partner had a long-term mating orientation. This finding was confirmed both after 6 weeks and 1 year after the speed-dating event. The researchers put the findings in perspective. From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long-term outcomes of speed-dating in a community sample.
European Journal of Personality. What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study. Journal of Personality, 77 How self-assessments can guide human mating decisions. Sex, relationships, and the mind's reproductive system pp. It's been in my experience that most women want a man who "is sweet and will treat them with respect and as equals" and yet they will fall head over heels for shallow men simply because they're exciting and a challenege and they believe they can save the guy from his immoral ways.
Often the quiet or shy ones are overlooked but they are usually the ones who are best suited for datinv relationships and speed dating success rates ready to commit. I've already witnesses women saying one thing and chasing speed dating success rates the complete opposite and it simply goes back to the age old question: I think the study itself rwtes confounded as it shows quantitave evidence that the majority of women go speed-dating to seek a long-term partner, but then rate the more sociosexual males higher.
Seeing as I have very little understanding of women as speed dating success rates the rest of us malesperhaps I'm missing something but it sounds quite counter-intuitive. The arguments for this seem either forced or just speculation because it seems that men who prefer casual encounters or are willing to engage in such, are less likely to want a long-term commitment.